world news

Obamacare Survives the Third Challenge of the U.S. Supreme Court Court News

The ruling marks the third time that the US Supreme Court has retained Obamacare since its promulgation in 2010.

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the challenge to the Obama-era health care laws and retained insurance coverage for millions of Americans.

The judges retained the entire law in a ruling on Thursday that found that Texas, other Republican-led states, and two people had no right to file a lawsuit in federal court.

The main provisions of the law include the protection of people with existing health conditions, a series of free preventive services, and the expansion of the Medicaid program to provide insurance for low-income people, including health insurance for those engaged in jobs that are not paid or provided.

It also retains the requirement that the law is not currently binding, that is, people must have health insurance or pay fines. When the U.S. Congress reduced the fine to zero in 2017, the clause became irrelevant.

U.S. President Barack Obama talked about the Affordable Care Act during a visit to Miami-Dade College in Miami, Florida [File: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters]

Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer did not decide with a 7-2 ruling that the broader legal issue raised in this case was whether a key provision in the law (formally known as the “Affordable Care Act”) Unconstitutional, if so, are the rest unconstitutional. This regulation should be repealed.

This clause is called “personal authorization” and requires Americans to obtain medical insurance or pay financial penalties.

This is the third time the court has reserved Obamacare Since its promulgation in 2010.

President Joe Biden’s government In February, the Supreme Court was urged to support Obamacare, which reversed the stance taken by the government of former President Donald Trump, who stepped down in January.

The ruling was made after Texas and 17 other Republican-controlled states filed a lawsuit, and the Trump administration later joined the lawsuit. After Trump refused to defend the law, a coalition of 20 states including the Democratic-controlled California and New York and the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives intervened in the case to try to protect Obamacare.

The two dissenting judges were conservative Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch.

Republicans strongly opposed the Obamacare reforms. They failed to repeal the two houses of Congress and failed to make the court invalidate the law. This was a landmark domestic policy achievement of former Democratic President Barack Obama. The Trump administration did take measures to obstruct the law.

The Republican-led Senate confirmed Trump’s third appointee in October and supported the Supreme Court’s victory with a 6-3 conservative majority. Amy Connie Barrett, But the Republican Obamacare challenger still left disappointed. The Supreme Court also resisted the Republican Party’s previous challenge to Obamacare in 2012 and 2015.

On Tuesday, during a debate on the “Affordable Care Act”, a demonstrator held up a sign in front of the U.S. Supreme Court [File: Alex Brandon/AP Photo]

Biden promised to expand the scope of healthcare and support Obamacare. Biden and other Democrats criticized the Republican Party’s efforts to repeal the law as the United States is struggling to deal with the deadly coronavirus pandemic.

If Obamacare is cancelled, as many as 20 million Americans will lose their health insurance, and insurance companies may again refuse to provide insurance for people with pre-existing diseases. Obamacare expanded the federal Medicaid program and created a market for private insurance.

In 2017, Trump signed a tax law backed by the Republican Party, abolishing financial penalties under personal authorization, which triggered a Republican lawsuit. Republican challengers believe that the tax law means that personal authorization can no longer be interpreted as a tax clause and is therefore illegal.

The Supreme Court previously supported Obamacare by treating financial penalties authorized by individuals as taxes permitted by the language of the constitutional taxation authority granted to Congress.



Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button